world news
March 18, 2018, 02:51:20 am
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: World News
  Home Help Gallery Links Login Register  

Gaddafi and the past

Recent Items
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Gaddafi and the past  (Read 900 times)
Sr. Member
Posts: 498

« on: February 25, 2011, 02:30:56 pm »

Encyclopedia of World Biography on Muammar Al- Gaddafi

Muammar Al-Gaddafi (born 1942) was head of the revolution that set up the Libyan Republic in 1969. In the Libyan Jamahiriyya, of which he was always the leader, Al-Gaddafi wanted to realize fully his concept of government by the masses.

Muammar Al-Gaddafi (also transcribed into other Western languages as Qaddafi, Gheddafi, and Khadafi, among others) was born in 1942, either in spring or in September. His birthplace was near Surt in the desert region of Libya bordering the Mediterranean along the Gulf of Sirte. He was the last child and only son in his family, people of modest means who belonged to the Bedouin tribe of the Qadhdhafa which was engaged in animal herding. The cultural traditions of the desert certainly influenced Gaddafi's and his sociopolitical ideas.

Involved In Student Movements

After receiving instruction in the teachings of the Koran, the sacred book of Islam, he attended the elementary school at Surt from 1953 to 1955.
Report Spam   Report to moderator   Logged
Sr. Member
Posts: 498

« Reply #1 on: February 25, 2011, 02:35:03 pm »

from his old website

Report Spam   Report to moderator   Logged
Sr. Member
Posts: 498

« Reply #2 on: February 25, 2011, 02:37:57 pm »

Report Spam   Report to moderator   Logged
Sr. Member
Posts: 498

« Reply #3 on: February 25, 2011, 02:42:51 pm »

The Definitive Solution of The Kashmiri Problem

It is an obligation to solve Kashmir problem peacefully because doing that will solve the problem of the everlasting rifted relation between the two sister neighbors, that is India and Pakistan.
Semantically, the meaning of the word “ Shikak” is taken from the notion of the breakup of one thing into two or more parts. Originally. What is called now Pakistan, Bangladesh and India was one geographical nation before the incidence of the breakup. They are sisters, indeed.

This breakup originated from a colonial conspiracy to avoid leaving behind a great nation with such demographic and geographic magnitude and such gigantic potentialities. The colonialism was the instigator of the different sectarian and doctrinal conflicts and the evidence is that before its incidence, the population was coexisting, peacefully, for a long period of time in the Indian peninsula.

Therefore,  British colonialism is responsible for the committed religious slaughters and the violent bloody clashes of that time. It’s this colonial conspiracy that escalated the situation to an unsolvable point that led to the breakup of that one and only entity into two sections, on sectarian and doctrinal basis, which is originally a reactionary and colonial theory.

It’s none of the interests of the inhabitants of the Indian peninsula to be disrupted and to have their potentialities dissipated and to lose those advantages, let alone to kill each other.

However, the efficient and pragmatic solution will finally prevail, in response to  globalization exigencies that is fashioning the world map into new big spaces and the inevitable and fatal vanishing of the notion of nation-state  becoming more and more incapable to survive in this era of great challenges and difficult rivalries. The new world is being fashioned on geographical basis and not on emotive reactionary ethnic or dogmatic bases (the EU, the AU etc..). The states of the Indian peninsula will find themselves obliged to merge in a single space.

Those who qualify the human blood and soul sacrifices as irresponsible acts and assimilate them to terrorism acts and the like are not apt to be mediators in solving “Kashmir” problem. We have to respect the blood and souls sacrificed by those humans, whether they were Muslims or Hindus. Those who stultify these sacrifices will not solve Kashmir problem or other ones.

Its has become obvious for the world and even for the population of that region that Kashmir is Kashmir, India is India and Pakistan is Pakistan. This is a solid ground on which we can build a solution to this problem. Things are different from what they used to be in the past. Even the similarity that once existed between Kashmir, Gunagad and Haidarabad has disappeared. The problem of the last two  was solved through a referendum according to the principle of separation that divided the Indian peninsula. It’s of no use, then, to argue that the independence of Kashmir may arise separatist claims in other provinces because this is unlikely to occur, since the status of all other provinces has been yet settled definitively and considering the subsequent Security Council resolutions, which stipulate a referendum as a solution to that problem, as it was the case in other provinces. Besides, arguing about what would be the religion of the governor, whether Hindu or Muslim and about the status of the parliament, whether local or non-local, is inadmissible, considering the international principles and resolutions in this respect.

Nevertheless, Kashmir, unlike other provinces, has a particular history, even if its population, like the other population of the Indian peninsula, is a mixture of Arions, Mongols, Turkish, and Afghans. It has also the same mixture of languages common in the peninsula.

Still, Kashmir has its own history. It was a conflict area between Buddhists and Brahmins. In a certain epoch, the Hindu’s culture and spirit prevailed till the advent of Islam. Among the particularities of Kashmir is that it was vended to a feudal family during the British occupation and remained under its control for nearly one century.
- Why was Kashmir accorded an autonomy broader than the one accorded to other provinces?
- Why was Kashmir excluded when the Indian peninsula was divided between India and Pakistan?
- And why was the problem of the two other provinces, namely Gunagad and Haidarabad, settled although they were excluded like Kashmir during the separation?
- Why the chief of the government of Kashmir was called prime minister just like the prime minister of India? Why does Kashmir have its own flag and own parliament?

It is of no use, now, to argue about the number of each religion followers since such matter was so interlaced and complicated that it was used as a playing card by the British occupation against the population of the Indian peninsula for disruptive schemes aiming at weakening that colossal entity by diving it into struggling states under the slogan of “ divide and rule”. India is not a Hindu state but a multi-religious one with Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs and it is, therefore, illogical to adapt that conflict as being between Muslims and Hindus. on the other hand, Kashmir is neither a Muslim state nor a Hindu one. It’s, on the contrary, a Hindu- Muslim state. If we follow the rule stipulating that Muslims must follow Pakistan and Hindus must follow India, this will lead to more instability in the Indian peninsula, and no definitive solution will be reached. So, we have to take away such an illogic and unfruitful approach, since it is the cause of that conflict; Muslims will remain Muslims and Hindus will remain Hindus.

It is remarkable here, that, up till now, no logical solution to this problem has been put forth and the approach continues to be emotive and fanatic, grounded on religious consideration. Involving religion is an evidence of the lack of seriousness in finding a true solution. Solely the interest of the Kashmiris must impose the solution but not the religious, ethnic and linguistic considerations, since these considerations haven’t interceded for other people in other parts of the world in a globalization era, facing common interest challenges that sole, link different peoples and renounce any religious ethnic or linguistic links.

In this respect, when we are neutral and sincere in seeking a solution to this conflict, we have to take into account the role of the international material interests of the neighboring countries of Kashmir, which, unfortunately, are being disguised by religious considerations and other emotive ones. Kashmir is a very important source of water and represents, at the same time, a security depth for the neighboring countries. Effectively, Kashmir is encompassed by four countries. Therefore, it would be inequitable to utilize or exploit religion by representing it as the cause of the problem and to omit other causes. Then, it is not permissible to sacrifice the interest of the Kashmiris and their cause for our own coveted objects and at their expense.

The truth is that Kashmir is for Kashmiris and the solution lies in the independence of Kashmir from both Pakistan and India. It has to be a neighboring country for both of them and at the same, a separating country for the four surrounding countries, like Nepal and Butane. In this respect, Eastern Timor independence is an illustrating example.

Besides, with the inevitable change of the world map to no more than spaces and the disappearance of the nation- states, due to their incapability to face  globalization challenges, the independence of Kashmir will be no more considered as a great change as it was the case in the past, in the flourishing state era. Kashmir as well as Butane, Nepal, Pakistan, Bangladesh Maldives, Sri Lanka and India will be all included in a sole space, namely the Indian Ocean space or the Indian peninsula space, like the EU, the AU and  ASIAN.

In this era of globalization, and in order to ensure the living of their  populations, the states of the Indian peninsula have no alternative but to merge in one demographic union, in an era where the nation- state will have no place even if possessing the German economy and technology or the French nuclear power. There is no future for France, Germany or any other European country outside a European union capable of coping with the challenges of globalization and the change of the world map into a space map instead of the conventional states based map. Each space will have one common defense and mutual security, one production and consumption market, one negotiating center with other spaces, one currency and one central bank.

This is the straight way and the most appropriate solution for the population of the region with a common destiny. The reactionary methods that caused tragedies and destruction must be banished forever. Kashmir must be independent for all Kashmiris whether they are Muslims or Hindus or others.
Report Spam   Report to moderator   Logged
Sr. Member
Posts: 498

« Reply #4 on: February 25, 2011, 02:47:55 pm »

Muammar Qaddafi
In case you want to send him an invitation to your garden party, his official title is "Guide of the First of September Great Revolution of the Arab Libyan Popular and Socialist Jamahirya". Helps run the country, organizes and harbors terrorists, writes children's books. Has been in power since 1969 through several American bombing campaigns and lots of nasty articles. Fabulous wardrobe.

Sep 1942    Muammar Qaddafi born.
1963    Graduates from the University of Libya.
1965    Graduates from the Royal Libyan Military Academy, Benghazi.
1 Sep 1969    Troops led by Muammar Qaddafi execute Operation Jerusalem, seizing control of Libya in a military coup.
1970    Expels U.S. and British military bases from Libya.
1970    Expels Jews from Libya.
1973    Nationalizes oil companies.
Sep 1978    Billy Carter visits Libya. Why Libya? "The only thing I can say is there is a hell of a lot more Arabians than there is Jews."
2 Dec 1979    U.S. Embassy in Libya attacked and burned by a mob.
Nov 1981    Libya purported to have dispatched assassins targeting Ronald Reagan.
5 Apr 1986    Libyan agents bomb La Belle Disco, West Berlin.
14 Apr 1986    U.S. bombs targets in Tripoli and Benghazi.
21 Dec 1988    Libyan agents place a bomb on Pan Am Flight 103, which detonates over Lockerbie, Scotland, killing 270.
31 Jan 2001    Libyan agent Abd al-Basit Ali Megrahi found guilty of the Lockerbie bombing by a Scottish court in the Netherlands.
Report Spam   Report to moderator   Logged
Sr. Member
Posts: 498

« Reply #5 on: February 25, 2011, 02:52:11 pm »

Report Spam   Report to moderator   Logged
Sr. Member
Posts: 498

« Reply #6 on: February 25, 2011, 02:54:25 pm »

Brother Leader of the Revolution Moammar Ghadhafi presents an analysis about the actual crisis the world is passing through about terrorism

1- Attack against America by striking Washington, the political capital and New York, the economic capital
It is a horrifying and memorable act is intentionally premeditated with forethought insistence has rather reached a tenacious scheming to the extent that it was branded by spectacular form.
2- The terrorist action
The first part concerns America as an aggressed over ,whatever are justifications of those who committed it.

America as any other states and individuals has the right to defend itself ,either in accordance with article 51 of the UN Charter ,that is actually inoperative or with else.

Right of self defense is a legitimate matter . And America possesses the power enabling it to.
In this regard America does not need anybody to defend itself , strike its enemy or even get assistance to justify that.
It is a kind of flattering to show readiness to assist America in a matter concerning her and capable of.
The second part : terrorism this matter does not concern
America alone. It concerns all the world. This needs an international cooperation and international procedure.
America could not fight it alone. And it is illogic and useless to change America with this mission.
What a pity ! mingling has appeared , as well as indistinctment, and confusion in perception.
Proceeding and cooperation in this matter (terrorism) is not a service to America like flatterers have shown.
It is a self defense for each of us. Either America was hit on 11\9 or not America should not reward who fight terrorism inasmuch as fighting terrorism is not a service to America as those show.
It is rather a service to yourself, who among us likes terrorism..who among us likes to live with his children, people and state in a world where terrorism prevails. Terrorism is an awful thing.
Unfortunately, the world has shown a high level of hibocrisy, from which has resulted a world uneasiness : are we defending America and helping to retaliate and punish those who stroke on 11\9 ? are we adopting an international program to fight terrorism , or according to our wishes eliminating it ?
There is a great deference between both matters . hypocrisy, fear and greediness are the elements behind this mingling , and this confusion these days .
There is pigheaded people that refused to cooperate to fight terrorism, because it has been connected with definding America, or with participation with it against Afghanistan.
There are those who hurried to strike Afghanistan ,
not because the are against terrorism but because the are against Taliban for reasons that concern them or because he is covetous , frightened or hypocrite.
We should exercise a sincere transparency in these days .He who likes to ally or cooperate with America to turn back its strike from its enemy should do it frankly.
This is not the first nor the last time in history where states ally or cooperate together to assist each other.
Every states is free to exercise its independence by standing with America against Afghanistan for instance or against Ben Laden.
Although America, as I said does not need anybody as for defending itself or take revenge.
As for terrorism the matter is different.. towards it we need each to other.. we need really an international cooperation striving long breath and new international policy.
But the terrorism subject is a sea without shore. We should not delude ourselves by thinking that we are capable of.
First: what is terrorism ? decisively we shall differ in the identification. And if it happens that we internationally agree freely and with absolute transparency about terrorism, we would have placed the cornerstone for a new world that may be void of terrorism. And that is a miracle!
But I am sure that we shall not agree about terrorism identification. The reason is clear. And that is what is considered a terrorism against we may be an appreciable action for you, when I am against you.. and so on. Evidences are present.
A youngster trained in Beshawar, then worked in Afghanistan. Then commissioned by the British intelligence to assassinate Ghadhafi, because if the revolution is ended, Libya should have surrendered and extradite the Lockerbie case suspects to America or the U.K. he did so, and all the worlds is witness about that but ALLAH be he exalted for above freezed the bomb.
It has not exploded inspite of burning of its fuse. That is a sign of ALLAH’s miracles. If it has exploded, a number of persons would have died among which families with their children on the tribune, as well as guests.
The terrorist has confessed whatever said above . the British intelligence offer has recognized that too. It is a terrorist aer manipulated by the British intelligence in cooperation with those who came from Afghanistan.
Then, what is a terrorism against me is a repaired action and encouraged by you who consider me as your adversary.
I do not consider myself enemy of the U.K nor to that Libya Afghan youngster. I feel that I am unjustly aggressed and victim of terrorism. The other part has his own justifications. Therefore, we differ in identifying terrorism.
I explain with all transparency because I am not afraid.. nor covetous or hypocrite.
I am a real internationalist voice knowing that the world is in upheaval but has not changed yet. We should transform it in an agreeable world .
Therefore, we should completely distinguish between what is under preparation actually against Afghanistan; as it appears as a direct result from what has happened in the form of dreadful act on the day 11/9 and fighting terrorism at the world level.
The first is the U.S responsibility, and the second is the world responsibility .. there is no excuse for non cooperating, and or non-allying for the second subject, e.g fighting terrorism, if we agree about it’s identification, and reasons.
Delaying or non making it make us neglect humanity future, and disappoint next generations.
Terrorism is a fact, justified by those who exercise it.
This is the grave thing. But if Northern Ireland case is resolved in a satisfactory way for all, there would not be an Irish violence or terrorism as nominated by the Uk ,and alegitimate struggle as nominated by the Irish Republican Army : if the Palestinian cause goes in the same manner, there whould not be Palestinian terrorism as nominated by the Israelis , or legitimate armed struggle as nominated by the Palestinians .
There shall not rather be any hostility between Arabs and America .But are those reasons? Terrorism? No not at all :there are multible other cases and groups exercising violence, terrorism and struggle far from Ireland and far from Palestine .
There are for instance, no limitation the Philippines Chechnya ,Kashmir, the Tibet , the Pasques , Corsica and Tamil etc:
How will Russia, America and Saudia agree about identifying what happens in Chechnya. Russia considers it terrorism and plot against its unity . America considers it repression against auto_determination and human rights: the mosques in Saudia consider it a holy war and pray for its victory .
I consider it a plot against Muslims in Russia to isolate dwarf them and deprive then from being nationals in a nuclear state .
Muslims may govern it one day as being Russians having the right to reach highest positions in there state; Russia.
Isolating them from Russia means depriving them from that, making them a dwarf incapable state .
The same happened to Bosnian Muslims who became minority even in the Bosnian Republic.
The Hersks , after being Yugoslav nationals , one of them ,Giamal din Baditchi became the second man after Tito , whereas he was the federal Yugoslavia’s prime minister nearly because he is a Yugoslav national :
But now they could not reach these posistions even in Bosnia itself.
Consequently Bosnia chapter was a plot and a calamity over Muslims , as well as chechens . And if we may by assumption resolve problems of these regions. There are other groups exercising violence and terrorism in Southern and Northern America , as well as in Europe and Japan. If we argumentatively succeed and eliminate these groups, there is the mafia (an Arabic word : the exempted ) ,and drug groups . And if we overcome them for instance by any way , there are other wicked groups that falsify currencies (there are more than 500 billions falsified dollars)..others clean dirty monies… others smuggle arms..others sell children..others trade women.
Then come Seattle group and thereafter. Jobless, dismissed and poor people .. population explosion, migration .. minorities .. nationalities and religions conflict .. rebelled scientists .. frivoulous amateurs .. bacterial virus , electronic and biological war .. etc.
The U.K first :
If we believe that youths that have been trained in Beshaour , who entered Afganistan , accompainied Ben Laden , and spread in the four earth corners are members in the so called Qaida Organization , then the British place has the lion’s share.
If the world likes to cooperate , we have the evidences. But is it true that we are going to attack terrorism bases and states that host terrorists. I don’t think so. Unless we say that we shall do as such against every state hosting terrorists. Unless it is the U.K .
And here we shall come again to gauge with two measurements , then the balance shall be disturbed, and international concord against terrorism and else will deteriorate.
We shall then lose the battle against terrorism.
We have heard Tony Ben, the spiritual leader of the labours in the U.K, who assumed several positions including the party leadership saying :” If America supports Israelis because it fears Jews in America itself , we too in the U.K may align with terrorists because we fear 7 millions Muslims in the U.K , most of them bearing the British nationality.
What has not been said by Tony Ben was mentioned to us by the British chief of intelligence. This has made Arab states mouthpiece say , are we going to be more allied with America than the British People .
What is the difference between the U.K and Afghanistan?
Let us see what America shall do towards the U.K , first.
Mixing between America’s right to replicate on an attack set on it and right of all of us to resist terrorism.
Mixing between Ben Laden , and Taliban and between Islam and terrorism , shall abort the international action.
Accelerating with steps that are considered against terrorism in the shade of America’s right to defend itself, makes the action lose its sense , abort a world program to know the reasons of terrorism , and ways to fight it internationally , as a common enemy of America only.
It is not useful for the U.S government to mix what is an international responsibility , with what is its own responsibility in front of its people from a national point of view.
I believe that the mistake comes from a tentative to duplicate a second Gulf operation. It is not capable because it is not applicable on the actual situation.
It came also from the crowding together of slipped columns of people who encouraged the U.S government to mix the cards, postpone what should be accelerated, and accelerate what should be acted in regard slowly.
If we like to repeat what has happened in the so-called second Gulf war, we are wrong. Whereas what has happened is a state invading another. That action was absolutely not directed towards America. The invading state was not America.
But Kuwait asked for help from America and the world against Iraq. Therefore it was necessary to involve the world from a moral and political aspect and the U.N from an international official and legal aspect, talking into consideration that the matter concerns all the world . It was not the U.S responsibility alone.
As to now, the matter differs the 11/9 attack was directed to the U.S alone. And she is able to replicate. She has the right to do.
It is illogical that the U.S asks for help from the world against Afghanistan, or against Ben Laden person. But fighting terrorism is the whole world responsibility.
I do not imagine that any responsible state in the world will fail to or contradict contribution in fighting terrorism.
However, today we are hearing about states that have agreed, and others refused.
What is this?!
The reason is because we mixed between advocating a state against its enemy, and fighting terrorism which is the enemy of all.
Are we against Islam? We Arabs, we Muslims.
Is he who is against Ben Laden is against Islam .. Is he who is against Taliban is against Islam.
This is the same mistake that resulted from same mixing between the U.S right to defend itself and the world’s responsibility towards terrorism .
Not he who is against Ben Laden or against the so-called Qaida Organization is against Islam .. and not he who is against Taliban is against Islam.
I do not think that we are against Ben Laden in his person or against his youths that anti Soviet Union state , then , have trained. Nor we are against students movement as one of Afghan factions.
We are against the heretical movement that emerged from that region , exactly as it has emerged from there during orthodox caliphs days and killed Omar , Ali and Otoman i.e three from the four orthodox caliphs.
We are victims of aggression, assassination and terror from those groups that come out of our countries stealthily to fight the Soviet Union in Afghanistan on behalf of others as mercenaries.
Even if the Russian army entered according to a request from the pro-Moscow Afghan government .. exactly just as foreign armies enter actually according to request from their governments. And this is Ben Laden pretext in his interview broadcast by a TV station.
Those groups come back to devastate and kill whoever they find on their way , even children and women , whom they mutilate.
Accompanied with a call subversive to Islam. They want to spread a wave of debauchery , tergiversation libertinism and consider others than them as miscreant. While they are exercising infidelity , dissoluteness , wrongdoing , misdeed and outrages for the sake of proceeding in an enraged way towards the unknown .. without a theory .. or a specified goal.
They have only massacring , torturing in a mad way. They do not understand anything out of repetition of nonsense world such as “idol” (taghout) which is a vague world that means worship something else than Allah.
They use it to designate a person .
It doesn’t mean a person in Arabic language.
The word Islamic sharia is too an ambiguous word . It is a concept without likewise the world phoenix.
We are against those and fight them like they do us. Nevertheless we are argumentally stronger than them because we defend a civilized society. We defend the religion against debauchery , heresy and destruction that they exercise.
This is a self-defense. It is necessary , and legitimate . likewise we do not accept a new caliphate succession. We shall resist it with all means we posses. We shall not deliver our necks against to a successor to govern us by order of Allah. Though Allah did not order him to . He Has no contact with Allah.
We are not more dupe and naive to believe that succession is from Allah.
Succession is a heterodoxy from its root.
Any innovation in the religion is a heresy.
And any heresy is an aberration . Aberration and its holder are hell.
Succession is a heresy , infidelity is a heresy.
The prophet did not design a deputy or a successor to him.
We have never heard about a deputy prophet out of Haron that Allah made him minister for Moses.
Therefore , we are against heresy , succession heresy and terrorism.
Where is situated Ben Laden . Where is situated Taliban in all that? Allah knows. But that door was opened in front of Tupe, naive and even good people .. they fought as mercenaries . They believed that they were striving . Magic has reversed on the wizard.
Now a door may be opened once again in front of some errant category that are easy to exploit. They shall be disappointed , return to their respective countries and to America itself. They shall exercise terrorism and madness like it was exercise by the first group. We shall then harvest thorns that our hand have planted like the previous time “ O ! Lord ! you witness , I did announce.”
Therefore , we are in front of new global , and complicated challenges , that make it wise to look to them without a humanitarian civilized perspective devoid of religious , ethnic , linguistic and geographic emotions.
Rag fanatism or past forms are useless.
Neither are useful missiles and bombs with it. We should reexamine everything. And bet for nothing . Because all what is in our hands is nothing.
Report Spam   Report to moderator   Logged
Sr. Member
Posts: 498

« Reply #7 on: February 27, 2011, 02:23:48 am »

Report Spam   Report to moderator   Logged
Pages: [1]
Jump to:  

Powered by EzPortal
Bookmark this site! | Upgrade This Forum
Free SMF Hosting - Create your own Forum

Powered by SMF | SMF © 2016, Simple Machines